Who is better, Pellegrini or Haughey?
Federica Pellegrini leads with a GOAT score of 83.4 against 83.4 for Siobhán Haughey — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Federica Pellegrini and Siobhán Haughey level at 83.4. Federica Pellegrini leads on Longevity. Siobhán Haughey leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Pellegrini wins: Longevity
Haughey wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/federica-pellegrini-vs-siobhan-haughey
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Pellegrini leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Pellegrini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 26 |
| 🇭🇰 Haughey | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 21 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | PellegriniRetired | HaugheyActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| World titles | 6 | — |
| Olympic medals | 2 | — |
| World records | 11 | — |
| European titles | 13 | — |
| Olympic silver medals | — | 2 |
| Olympic bronze medals | — | 2 |
| Short-course world titles | — | 4 |
| Short-course world records | — | 2 |
| Asian records | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 86 |
Federica Pellegrini leads with a GOAT score of 83.4 against 83.4 for Siobhán Haughey — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Haughey scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Pellegrini leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Pellegrini: 83.4, Haughey: 83.4.
Make your case for Pellegrini vs Haughey. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.