Who is better, Burdisso or Arnarson?
Federico Burdisso leads with a GOAT score of 74.5 against 74.0 for Örn Arnarson — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Federico Burdisso above Örn Arnarson: 74.5 vs 74.0. Federico Burdisso leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak. Örn Arnarson leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Burdisso wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Arnarson wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/federico-burdisso-vs-orn-arnarson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Burdisso leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Burdisso | 0 | 0 | 117 | 233 | 577.55 | 924.35 |
| 🇮🇸 Arnarson | 0 | 0 | 50 | 112 | 366 | 708 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BurdissoActive | ArnarsonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| European Championship medals | 3 | — |
| World Junior titles | 1 | — |
| 200 m butterfly best | 114.45 | — |
| Olympic Games | 2 | — |
| European short course titles | — | 2 |
| European long course medals | — | 1 |
| Icelandic records | — | 20 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 3 |
| Years at the top level | — | 12 |
| Dominance w25% | 68 | 66 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Longevity w20% | 68 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 74 |
Federico Burdisso leads with a GOAT score of 74.5 against 74.0 for Örn Arnarson — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Arnarson scores higher on longevity. Burdisso leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Burdisso: 74.5, Arnarson: 74.0.
Make your case for Burdisso vs Arnarson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.