Who is better, Burdisso or Bukhov?
Vladyslav Bukhov leads with a GOAT score of 74.9 against 74.5 for Federico Burdisso — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Vladyslav Bukhov above Federico Burdisso: 74.9 vs 74.5. Vladyslav Bukhov leads on Dominance, Honours. Federico Burdisso leads on Statistics, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bukhov wins: Dominance, Honours
Burdisso wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/federico-burdisso-vs-vladyslav-bukhov
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bukhov leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Burdisso | 0 | 0 | 117 | 233 | 577.55 | 924.35 |
| 🇺🇦 Bukhov | 0 | 0 | 55 | 121 | 367 | 633 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BurdissoActive | BukhovActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| European Championship medals | 3 | 3 |
| World Junior titles | 1 | — |
| 200 m butterfly best | 114.45 | — |
| Olympic Games | 2 | — |
| European titles | — | 1 |
| Short course world medals | — | 2 |
| Personal best 50 m free (s) | — | 21.29 |
| Ukrainian records | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 68 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 68 | 66 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 78 |
Vladyslav Bukhov leads with a GOAT score of 74.9 against 74.5 for Federico Burdisso — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Burdisso scores higher on statistics, longevity. Bukhov leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Burdisso: 74.5, Bukhov: 74.9.
Make your case for Burdisso vs Bukhov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.