Who is better, Chiesa or Mellberg?
Federico Chiesa leads with a GOAT score of 82.1 against 82.1 for Olof Mellberg — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Federico Chiesa and Olof Mellberg level at 82.1. Federico Chiesa leads on Honours, Peak, Dominance. Olof Mellberg leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Chiesa wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Mellberg wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/federico-chiesa-v-vs-olof-mellberg-v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Chiesa leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Chiesa | 0 | 0 | 55 | 117 | 264 | 703 |
| 🇸🇪 Mellberg | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 296 | 614 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ChiesaActive · Liverpool | MellbergRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European Championship titles | 1 | — |
| Euro 2020 goals | 2 | — |
| Coppa Italia titles | 1 | — |
| Italy caps | 55 | — |
| Career goals | 90 | — |
| Sweden caps | — | 117 |
| Sweden goals | — | 8 |
| Major tournaments | — | 5 |
| Premier League appearances | — | 230 |
| League titles | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 89 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 84 |
Federico Chiesa leads with a GOAT score of 82.1 against 82.1 for Olof Mellberg — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Mellberg scores higher on statistics, longevity. Chiesa leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Chiesa: 82.1, Mellberg: 82.1.
Make your case for Chiesa vs Mellberg. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.