Who is better, Jenkins or Henderson?
Ferguson Jenkins leads with a GOAT score of 89.2 against 89.1 for Rickey Henderson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ferguson Jenkins above Rickey Henderson: 89.2 vs 89.1. Ferguson Jenkins leads on Peak, Honours, Statistics. Rickey Henderson leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Jenkins wins: Peak, Honours, Statistics
Henderson wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/ferguson-jenkins-vs-rickey-henderson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Jenkins leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Jenkins | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 67 | 147 |
| 🇺🇸 Henderson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 394 | 668 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | JenkinsRetired | HendersonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Cy Young awards | 1 | — |
| Career wins | 284 | — |
| Career strikeouts | 3,192 | — |
| 20-win seasons | 7 | — |
| Career complete games | 267 | — |
| Stolen bases | — | 1,406 |
| Runs scored | — | 2,295 |
| MVP awards | — | 1 |
| World Series titles | — | 2 |
| All-Star selections | — | 10 |
| Leadoff home runs | — | 81 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 94 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 93 |
Ferguson Jenkins leads with a GOAT score of 89.2 against 89.1 for Rickey Henderson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Henderson scores higher on longevity. Jenkins leads on peak, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Jenkins: 89.2, Henderson: 89.1.
Make your case for Jenkins vs Henderson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.