Who is better, Venturini or Steffes?
Fernanda Venturini leads with a GOAT score of 84.7 against 84.7 for Kent Steffes — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Fernanda Venturini and Kent Steffes level at 84.7. Fernanda Venturini leads on Longevity. Kent Steffes leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Venturini wins: Longevity
Steffes wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/fernanda-venturini-vs-kent-steffes
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Venturini leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇷 Venturini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 43 |
| 🇺🇸 Steffes | 0 | 0 | 55 | 121 | 287 | 753 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | VenturiniRetired | SteffesRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| World Grand Prix titles | 4 | — |
| Best setter awards | 4 | — |
| Brazil caps | 300 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 4 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| AVP tour wins | — | 100 |
| AVP MVP awards | — | 2 |
| Tour season titles | — | 4 |
| Years at the top level | — | 11 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 86 |
Fernanda Venturini leads with a GOAT score of 84.7 against 84.7 for Kent Steffes — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Steffes scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Venturini leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Venturini: 84.7, Steffes: 84.7.
Make your case for Venturini vs Steffes. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.