Who is better, flameZ or XBOCT?
Shahar "flameZ" Shushan leads with a GOAT score of 82.3 against 82.3 for Alexander "XBOCT" Dashkevich — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Shahar "flameZ" Shushan and Alexander "XBOCT" Dashkevich level at 82.3. Shahar "flameZ" Shushan leads on Statistics. Alexander "XBOCT" Dashkevich leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →flameZ wins: Statistics
XBOCT wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/flamez-vs-xboct-dota
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
flameZ leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇱 flameZ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.09 | 4.46 | 6.77 |
| 🇺🇦 XBOCT | 0 | 0 | 80 | 176 | 434 | 564 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | flameZActive | XBOCTRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Majors won | 1 | — |
| Big events won | 9 | — |
| Top-20 player rankings | 2 | — |
| Career rating | 1.14 | — |
| MVP medals | 2 | — |
| The International titles | — | 1 |
| The International finals | — | 3 |
| Major titles | — | 3 |
| The International appearances | — | 5 |
| Professional seasons | — | 7 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 82 |
Shahar "flameZ" Shushan leads with a GOAT score of 82.3 against 82.3 for Alexander "XBOCT" Dashkevich — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
XBOCT scores higher on longevity. flameZ leads on statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. flameZ: 82.3, XBOCT: 82.3.
Make your case for flameZ vs XBOCT. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.