Who is better, Flash or Malr1ne?
Lee "Flash" Young-ho leads with a GOAT score of 91.3 against 22.7 for Malr1ne — a gap of 68.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Flash vs Malr1ne
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Lee "Flash" Young-ho above Malr1ne: 91.3 vs 22.7. Lee "Flash" Young-ho leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
FlashWinner
91.3Flash wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Malr1ne
22.7Malr1ne wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to EsportsShareable URL · /compare/flash-vs-nl-malr1ne
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇰🇷 Lee "Flash" Young-ho
91.3
Flash leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Malr1ne — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
1. Lee "Flash" Young-ho
2. Malr1ne
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Through age 21 · Form index per season
1. 🇰🇷 Lee "Flash" Young-ho12 trophies
7 seasons by age 21 · 1.7 per season
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Malr1ne — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Flash91.3
Malr1ne22.7
FAQ
Where does Malr1ne beat Flash?
Malr1ne does not lead any of the five categories; Flash is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the Flash vs Malr1ne score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Flash: 91.3, Malr1ne: 22.7.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Flash vs Malr1ne. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.