Who is better, Flash or s1mple?
Oleksandr "s1mple" Kostyliev leads with a GOAT score of 91.9 against 91.3 for Lee "Flash" Young-ho — a gap of 0.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Oleksandr "s1mple" Kostyliev above Lee "Flash" Young-ho: 91.9 vs 91.3. Oleksandr "s1mple" Kostyliev leads on Longevity, Statistics, Peak. Lee "Flash" Young-ho leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →s1mple wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Flash wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/flash-vs-s1mple
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
s1mple leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
s1mple is -66.7% behind Flash's pace at age 21
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | FlashRetired · KT / Afreeca era | s1mpleActive · Falcons (stand-in) |
|---|---|---|
| Individual league titles | 7 | — |
| Career win rate | 73.6% | — |
| Premier finals | 12 | — |
| Team league titles | 6 | — |
| Pro seasons | 10 | — |
| Career prize money (M$) | 0.5 | 1.9 |
| Major titles | — | 1 |
| HLTV Player of the Year | — | 2 |
| HLTV top-20 appearances | — | 8 |
| Career rating 2.0 | — | 1.24 |
| Big event MVPs | — | 21 |
| Dominance w25% | 97 | 94 |
| Peak w20% | 98 | 99 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 95 | 97 |
Oleksandr "s1mple" Kostyliev leads with a GOAT score of 91.9 against 91.3 for Lee "Flash" Young-ho — a gap of 0.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Flash scores higher on dominance, honours. s1mple leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Flash: 91.3, s1mple: 91.9.
Make your case for Flash vs s1mple. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.