Who is better, Pennetta or Davenport?
Flavia Pennetta leads with a GOAT score of 81.2 against 81.1 for Lindsay Davenport — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Flavia Pennetta above Lindsay Davenport: 81.2 vs 81.1. Flavia Pennetta leads on Peak, Honours. Lindsay Davenport leads on Dominance, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Pennetta wins: Peak, Honours
Davenport wins: Dominance, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/flavia-pennetta-vs-lindsay-davenport
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Pennetta leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Pennetta | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| 🇺🇸 Davenport | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 35 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | PennettaRetired | DavenportRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam singles titles | 1 | — |
| WTA titles | 11 | — |
| Fed Cup titles | 4 | — |
| Doubles world No. 1 weeks | 4 | — |
| Career-high singles ranking | 6 | — |
| Grand Slam titles | — | 3 |
| Olympic golds | — | 1 |
| Career titles | — | 55 |
| Weeks at No. 1 | — | 98 |
| Year-end No. 1 | — | 4 |
| Grand Slam doubles titles | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 85 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 82 |
Flavia Pennetta leads with a GOAT score of 81.2 against 81.1 for Lindsay Davenport — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Davenport scores higher on dominance, longevity. Pennetta leads on peak, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Pennetta: 81.2, Davenport: 81.1.
Make your case for Pennetta vs Davenport. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.