Who is better, Little or Namath?
Floyd Little leads with a GOAT score of 82.7 against 82.5 for Joe Namath — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Floyd Little above Joe Namath: 82.7 vs 82.5. Floyd Little leads on Statistics, Dominance, Longevity. Joe Namath leads on Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Little wins: Dominance, Longevity, Statistics
Namath wins: Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/floyd-little-vs-joe-namath
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Little leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Little | 0 | 0 | 50 | 111 | 363 | 593 |
| 🇺🇸 Namath | 0 | 0 | 45 | 107 | 373 | 649 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | LittleRetired | NamathRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Rushing titles | 1 | — |
| Career rushing yards | 6,323 | — |
| Pro Bowls | 5 | 5 |
| All-purpose yards | 12,173 | — |
| Seasons played | 9 | — |
| Super Bowl titles | — | 1 |
| Super Bowl MVP awards | — | 1 |
| Passing yards | — | 27,663 |
| First 4,000-yard passing season | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 84 |
Floyd Little leads with a GOAT score of 82.7 against 82.5 for Joe Namath — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Namath scores higher on peak, honours. Little leads on dominance, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Little: 82.7, Namath: 82.5.
Make your case for Little vs Namath. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.