Who is better, flusha or Impact?
Jung "Impact" Eon-yeong leads with a GOAT score of 84.6 against 84.5 for flusha — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
flusha vs Impact
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jung "Impact" Eon-yeong above flusha: 84.6 vs 84.5. Jung "Impact" Eon-yeong leads on Longevity. flusha leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ImpactWinner
84.6Impact wins: Longevity
flusha
84.5flusha wins: Dominance, Honours
Candidates
Locked to EsportsShareable URL · /compare/flusha-vs-impact-lol
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇰🇷 Jung "Impact" Eon-yeong
84.6
Impact leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Jung "Impact" Eon-yeong
2. flusha
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through split year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇰🇷 Jung "Impact" Eon-yeong5 split years played · career day 1,825426 trophies
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 flusha5 split years played · career day 1,826388 trophies
-8.9% vs Impact at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 flusha | 0 | 0 | 52 | 120 | 298 | 658 |
| 🇰🇷 Impact | 0 | 0 | 96 | 180 | 426 | 752 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | flushaRetired | ImpactActive |
|---|---|---|
| Majors won | 3 | — |
| Major MVP awards | 1 | — |
| HLTV top-20 appearances | 4 | — |
| Big event titles | 20 | — |
| Major finals reached | 4 | — |
| World Championship titles | — | 1 |
| LCS titles | — | 3 |
| LCK titles | — | 2 |
| World Championship appearances | — | 6 |
| Professional seasons | — | 13 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 82 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Impact84.6
flusha84.5
FAQ
Where does flusha beat Impact?
flusha scores higher on dominance, honours. Impact leads on longevity.
How is the flusha vs Impact score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. flusha: 84.5, Impact: 84.6.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for flusha vs Impact. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.