Who is better, flusha or JW?
Jesper "JW" Wecksell leads with a GOAT score of 84.6 against 84.5 for flusha — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
flusha vs JW
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jesper "JW" Wecksell above flusha: 84.6 vs 84.5. Jesper "JW" Wecksell leads on Longevity, Peak, Statistics. flusha leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
JWWinner
84.6JW wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
flusha
84.5flusha wins: Dominance, Honours
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇸🇪 Jesper "JW" Wecksell
84.6
JW leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Jesper "JW" Wecksell
2. flusha
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through split year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇸🇪 Jesper "JW" Wecksell5 split years played · career day 1,825412 trophies
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 flusha5 split years played · career day 1,826388 trophies
-5.8% vs JW at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 flusha | 0 | 0 | 52 | 120 | 298 | 658 |
| 🇸🇪 JW | 0 | 0 | 60 | 136 | 412 | 716 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
JW84.6
flusha84.5
FAQ
Where does flusha beat JW?
flusha scores higher on dominance, honours. JW leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
How is the flusha vs JW score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. flusha: 84.5, JW: 84.6.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for flusha vs JW. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.