AthletesTeams
Fly vs Bang
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
FlyWinner
83.9Fly wins: Longevity
Bang
83.9Bang wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇮🇱 Fly
83.9
Fly leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories. Major-winning captain with OG and Evil Geniuses.
1. Fly
2. Bae "Bang" Jun-sik
Category breakdown
Season form · Trophies per season
Career timeline · Trophies per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through split year 5 · Trophies per season1. 🇰🇷 Bae "Bang" Jun-sik5 split years played · career day 1,825420 trophies
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇮🇱 Fly5 split years played · career day 1,826338 trophies
-19.5% vs Bang at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇱 Fly | 0 | 0 | 52 | 112 | 255 | 683 |
| 🇰🇷 Bang | 0 | 0 | 66 | 158 | 420 | 546 |
Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 split years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.
| Metric | FlyActive | BangRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 3 | — |
| TI appearances | 8 | — |
| TI top-four finishes | 2 | — |
| Career seasons | 13 | — |
| Career prize money (USD m) | 2 | — |
| World Championship titles | — | 2 |
| LCK titles | — | 4 |
| Mid-Season Invitational titles | — | 2 |
| World finals | — | 3 |
| Professional seasons | — | 7 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 84 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Fly83.9
Bang83.9
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Fly vs Bang. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.