Who is better, DeBernardi or Cooper?
Charles Cooper leads with a GOAT score of 83.4 against 83.2 for Forrest DeBernardi — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Charles Cooper above Forrest DeBernardi: 83.4 vs 83.2. Charles Cooper leads on Longevity, Dominance. Forrest DeBernardi leads on Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Cooper wins: Dominance, Longevity
DeBernardi wins: Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/forrest-debernardi-vs-tarzan-cooper
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Cooper leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 DeBernardi | 0 | 0 | 55 | 118 | 267 | 691 |
| 🇺🇸 Cooper | 0 | 0 | 62 | 136 | 404 | 766 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | DeBernardiRetired | CooperRetired |
|---|---|---|
| AAU All-American selections | 5 | — |
| AAU national titles | 3 | — |
| College All-America honours | 2 | — |
| Seasons at national level | 12 | — |
| Hall of Fame inductions | 1 | — |
| World Professional Tournament titles | — | 1 |
| Rens win streak in 1932-33 | — | 88 |
| Hall of Fame induction | — | 1,977 |
| Seasons with the Rens | — | 11 |
| Years at the top level | — | 17 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 80 |
Charles Cooper leads with a GOAT score of 83.4 against 83.2 for Forrest DeBernardi — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
DeBernardi scores higher on honours, statistics. Cooper leads on dominance, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. DeBernardi: 83.2, Cooper: 83.4.
Make your case for DeBernardi vs Cooper. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.