Who is better, Gregg or Fitzgerald?
Larry Fitzgerald leads with a GOAT score of 90.4 against 90.3 for Forrest Gregg — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Larry Fitzgerald above Forrest Gregg: 90.4 vs 90.3. Larry Fitzgerald leads on Longevity, Statistics, Peak. Forrest Gregg leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Fitzgerald wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Gregg wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/forrest-gregg-vs-larry-fitzgerald
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Fitzgerald leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Gregg | 0 | 0 | 50 | 107 | 240 | 674 |
| 🇺🇸 Fitzgerald | 0 | 0 | 780 | 2,189 | 4,544 | 10,413 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GreggRetired | FitzgeraldRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NFL titles | 6 | — |
| Pro Bowls | 9 | 11 |
| Consecutive games played | 188 | — |
| All-Pro selections | 7 | — |
| Super Bowl titles | 3 | — |
| Career receptions | — | 1,432 |
| Career receiving yards | — | 17,492 |
| Career touchdowns | — | 121 |
| Seasons played | — | 17 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 94 |
| Honours w20% | 94 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 94 |
Larry Fitzgerald leads with a GOAT score of 90.4 against 90.3 for Forrest Gregg — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Gregg scores higher on dominance, honours. Fitzgerald leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Gregg: 90.3, Fitzgerald: 90.4.
Make your case for Gregg vs Fitzgerald. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.