Who is better, Hewitt or Gretzky?
Wayne Gretzky leads with a GOAT score of 97.8 against 87.4 for Foster Hewitt — a gap of 10.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Wayne Gretzky above Foster Hewitt: 97.8 vs 87.4. Wayne Gretzky leads on Honours, Dominance, Statistics. Foster Hewitt leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Gretzky wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Hewitt wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/foster-hewitt-vs-gretzky
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Gretzky leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Hewitt — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | HewittRetired | GretzkyRetired · New York Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| Years broadcasting hockey | 58 | — |
| Stanley Cup finals called | 40 | — |
| Summit Series games called | 8 | — |
| Hall of Fame inductions | 1 | — |
| Award named after him | 1 | — |
| Career points | — | 2,857 |
| Career goals | — | 894 |
| Stanley Cups | — | 4 |
| Hart Trophies | — | 9 |
| Art Ross Trophies | — | 10 |
| Points per game | — | 1.92 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 100 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 100 |
| Longevity w20% | 96 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 97 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 100 |
Wayne Gretzky leads with a GOAT score of 97.8 against 87.4 for Foster Hewitt — a gap of 10.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hewitt scores higher on longevity. Gretzky leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hewitt: 87.4, Gretzky: 97.8.
Make your case for Hewitt vs Gretzky. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.