Who is better, Hewitt or Cleghorn?
Sprague Cleghorn leads with a GOAT score of 87.5 against 87.4 for Foster Hewitt — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Sprague Cleghorn above Foster Hewitt: 87.5 vs 87.4. Sprague Cleghorn leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. Foster Hewitt leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Cleghorn wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Hewitt wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/foster-hewitt-vs-sprague-cleghorn
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Cleghorn leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Hewitt | 0 | 0 | 10 | 30 | 150 | 450 |
| 🇨🇦 Cleghorn | 0 | 0 | 50 | 109 | 342 | 659 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HewittRetired | CleghornRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Years broadcasting hockey | 58 | — |
| Stanley Cup finals called | 40 | — |
| Summit Series games called | 8 | — |
| Hall of Fame inductions | 1 | — |
| Award named after him | 1 | — |
| Stanley Cups | — | 4 |
| Career goals | — | 84 |
| Career points | — | 123 |
| Games played | — | 259 |
| Seasons played | — | 11 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 96 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 88 |
Sprague Cleghorn leads with a GOAT score of 87.5 against 87.4 for Foster Hewitt — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hewitt scores higher on longevity. Cleghorn leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hewitt: 87.4, Cleghorn: 87.5.
Make your case for Hewitt vs Cleghorn. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.