Who is better, Kirby or Lindahl?
Fran Kirby leads with a GOAT score of 82.3 against 82.3 for Hedvig Lindahl — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Fran Kirby and Hedvig Lindahl level at 82.3. Fran Kirby leads on Peak, Honours, Dominance. Hedvig Lindahl leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kirby wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Lindahl wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/fran-kirby-vs-hedvig-lindahl
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kirby leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Kirby | 0 | 0 | 8 | 20 | 60 | 123 |
| 🇸🇪 Lindahl | 0 | 0 | 6 | 18 | 52 | 157 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KirbyActive | LindahlRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European Championship titles | 1 | — |
| Women's Super League titles | 5 | 2 |
| FWA Women's Footballer of the Year awards | 2 | — |
| England caps | 77 | — |
| England goals | 19 | — |
| Sweden caps | — | 190 |
| Olympic silver medals | — | 2 |
| World Cup bronze medals | — | 2 |
| Damallsvenskan titles | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 80 |
Fran Kirby leads with a GOAT score of 82.3 against 82.3 for Hedvig Lindahl — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Lindahl scores higher on longevity. Kirby leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kirby: 82.3, Lindahl: 82.3.
Make your case for Kirby vs Lindahl. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.