Who is better, Tarkenton or Thomas?
Fran Tarkenton leads with a GOAT score of 81.9 against 81.8 for Thurman Thomas — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Fran Tarkenton above Thurman Thomas: 81.9 vs 81.8. Fran Tarkenton leads on Longevity, Dominance. Thurman Thomas leads on Honours, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Tarkenton wins: Dominance, Longevity
Thomas wins: Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/fran-tarkenton-vs-thurman-thomas
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Tarkenton leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Tarkenton | 0 | 0 | 1,997 | 4,592 | 12,018 | 23,140 |
| 🇺🇸 Thomas | 0 | 0 | 881 | 2,125 | 4,829 | 10,762 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fran Tarkenton leads with a GOAT score of 81.9 against 81.8 for Thurman Thomas — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Thomas scores higher on peak, honours. Tarkenton leads on dominance, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Tarkenton: 81.9, Thomas: 81.8.
Make your case for Tarkenton vs Thomas. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.