GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Schiavone vs Martínez

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MartínezWinner
82.0

Martínez wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics

Schiavone
80.8

Schiavone wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/francesca-schiavone-vs-conchita-martinez

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇪🇸 Conchita Martínez
82.0

Martínez leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Wimbledon champion in 1994 and a Fed Cup winner five times.

1. Conchita Martínez
82.0
2. Francesca Schiavone
80.8

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇪🇸 Conchita Martínez5 seasons played · career day 1,82613 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇮🇹 Francesca Schiavone5 seasons played · career day 2,5567 titles
-46.2% vs Martínez at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇮🇹 Schiavone0000410
🇪🇸 Martínez00131029

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricSchiavoneRetiredMartínezRetired
Grand Slam singles titles11
WTA titles833
Fed Cup titles45
Career-high ranking42
Career match wins528
Olympic medals3
Dominance w25%7276
Peak w20%8686
Longevity w20%9086
Honours w20%7880
Statistics w15%8084

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Martínez82.0
Schiavone80.8
The people
Schiavone
Martínez

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Schiavone vs Martínez. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →