Who is better, Schiavone or Parke?
James Cecil Parke leads with a GOAT score of 81.0 against 80.8 for Francesca Schiavone — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks James Cecil Parke above Francesca Schiavone: 81.0 vs 80.8. James Cecil Parke leads on Statistics, Peak, Dominance. Francesca Schiavone leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Parke wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Schiavone wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/francesca-schiavone-vs-james-cecil-parke
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Parke leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Schiavone | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 10 |
| 🇮🇪 Parke | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 46 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
James Cecil Parke leads with a GOAT score of 81.0 against 80.8 for Francesca Schiavone — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Schiavone scores higher on longevity. Parke leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Schiavone: 80.8, Parke: 81.0.
Make your case for Schiavone vs Parke. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.