Who is better, Crews-Dezurn or Rijker?
Franchón Crews-Dezurn leads with a GOAT score of 79.2 against 79.1 for Lucia Rijker — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Franchón Crews-Dezurn above Lucia Rijker: 79.2 vs 79.1. Franchón Crews-Dezurn leads on Longevity, Honours. Lucia Rijker leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Crews-Dezurn wins: Longevity, Honours
Rijker wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/franchon-crews-dezurn-vs-lucia-rijker
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Crews-Dezurn leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Crews-Dezurn | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 270 | 686 |
| 🇳🇱 Rijker | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 12 | 17 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Crews-DezurnActive | RijkerRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Undisputed world titles | 1 | — |
| World title belts held | 4 | — |
| World title fights | 8 | — |
| Amateur national titles | 5 | — |
| Professional wins | 8 | — |
| Professional boxing wins | — | 17 |
| Boxing losses | — | 0 |
| Knockouts | — | 14 |
| Kickboxing record wins | — | 37 |
| Kickboxing world titles | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 62 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 86 |
Franchón Crews-Dezurn leads with a GOAT score of 79.2 against 79.1 for Lucia Rijker — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Rijker scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Crews-Dezurn leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Crews-Dezurn: 79.2, Rijker: 79.1.
Make your case for Crews-Dezurn vs Rijker. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.