Who is better, Colapinto or Chilton?
Franco Colapinto leads with a GOAT score of 58.7 against 54.0 for Max Chilton — a gap of 4.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Franco Colapinto above Max Chilton: 58.7 vs 54.0. Franco Colapinto leads on Peak, Statistics, Dominance. Max Chilton leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Colapinto wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Chilton wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/franco-colapinto-vs-max-chilton-f1v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Colapinto leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇷 Colapinto | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 🇬🇧 Chilton | 0 | 0 | 36 | 79 | 246 | 463 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ColapintoActive | ChiltonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Prix starts | 24 | — |
| Career points | 5 | — |
| Best race finish | 8 | — |
| Formula 3 wins | 2 | — |
| Seasons contested | 2 | — |
| Formula One starts | — | 35 |
| Consecutive race finishes | — | 25 |
| IndyCar starts | — | 90 |
| Indy 500 laps led | — | 50 |
| GP2 race wins | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 54 | 48 |
| Peak w20% | 76 | 58 |
| Longevity w20% | 48 | 64 |
| Honours w20% | 48 | 46 |
| Statistics w15% | 72 | 56 |
Franco Colapinto leads with a GOAT score of 58.7 against 54.0 for Max Chilton — a gap of 4.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Chilton scores higher on longevity. Colapinto leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Colapinto: 58.7, Chilton: 54.0.
Make your case for Colapinto vs Chilton. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.