Who is better, Cevert or Revson?
Peter Revson leads with a GOAT score of 71.8 against 71.7 for François Cevert — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Cevert vs Revson
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Peter Revson above François Cevert: 71.8 vs 71.7. Peter Revson leads on Longevity. François Cevert leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
RevsonWinner
71.8Revson wins: Longevity
Cevert
71.7Cevert wins: Dominance, Honours
Candidates
Locked to Formula 1Shareable URL · /compare/francois-cevert-vs-peter-revson
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Peter Revson
71.8
Revson leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Peter Revson
2. François Cevert
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 4 · Form index per season1. 🇫🇷 François Cevert4 seasons played · career day 1,82517 race wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Peter Revson4 seasons played · career day 4,0178 race wins
-52.9% vs Cevert at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇷 Cevert | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 17 |
| 🇺🇸 Revson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 4 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Revson71.8
Cevert71.7
FAQ
Where does Cevert beat Revson?
Cevert scores higher on dominance, honours. Revson leads on longevity.
How is the Cevert vs Revson score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cevert: 71.7, Revson: 71.8.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Cevert vs Revson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.