Who is better, Baltrusch or Carlin?
Frank Baltrusch leads with a GOAT score of 80.4 against 80.3 for Jazmin Carlin — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Frank Baltrusch above Jazmin Carlin: 80.4 vs 80.3. Frank Baltrusch leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics. Jazmin Carlin leads on Longevity, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Baltrusch wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Carlin wins: Peak, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/frank-baltrusch-vs-jazmin-carlin
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Baltrusch leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Baltrusch | 0 | 0 | 50 | 115 | 366 | 472 |
| 🇬🇧 Carlin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 38 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BaltruschRetired | CarlinRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship medals | 1 | 1 |
| European Championship medals | 2 | — |
| National titles | 6 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 1 | — |
| National records set | 4 | — |
| Olympic medals | — | 2 |
| European titles | — | 2 |
| Commonwealth medals | — | 2 |
| British records | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 84 |
Frank Baltrusch leads with a GOAT score of 80.4 against 80.3 for Jazmin Carlin — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Carlin scores higher on peak, longevity. Baltrusch leads on dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Baltrusch: 80.4, Carlin: 80.3.
Make your case for Baltrusch vs Carlin. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.