Who is better, Baltrusch or Rice?
Frank Baltrusch leads with a GOAT score of 80.4 against 80.3 for Stephanie Rice — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Frank Baltrusch above Stephanie Rice: 80.4 vs 80.3. Frank Baltrusch leads on Longevity, Statistics. Stephanie Rice leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Baltrusch wins: Longevity, Statistics
Rice wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/frank-baltrusch-vs-stephanie-rice
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Baltrusch leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Baltrusch | 0 | 0 | 50 | 115 | 366 | 472 |
| 🇦🇺 Rice | 0 | 0 | 70 | 154 | 420 | 616 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BaltruschRetired | RiceRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship medals | 1 | 3 |
| European Championship medals | 2 | — |
| National titles | 6 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 1 | — |
| National records set | 4 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 3 |
| World records set | — | 2 |
| Commonwealth Games golds | — | 3 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 66 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 82 |
Frank Baltrusch leads with a GOAT score of 80.4 against 80.3 for Stephanie Rice — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Rice scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Baltrusch leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Baltrusch: 80.4, Rice: 80.3.
Make your case for Baltrusch vs Rice. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.