Who is better, Chance or Faber?
Red Faber leads with a GOAT score of 86.6 against 86.5 for Frank Chance — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Chance vs Faber
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Red Faber above Frank Chance: 86.6 vs 86.5. Red Faber leads on Longevity, Statistics. Frank Chance leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
FaberWinner
86.6Faber wins: Longevity, Statistics
Chance
86.5Chance wins: Dominance, Honours
Candidates
Locked to BaseballShareable URL · /compare/frank-chance-vs-red-faber
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Red Faber
86.6
Faber leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Red Faber
2. Frank Chance
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Red Faber5 seasons played · career day 1,82571 home runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Frank Chance5 seasons played · career day 2,5551.5 home runs
-97.9% vs Faber at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Chance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.857 | 2.422 |
| 🇺🇸 Faber | 0 | 0 | 10 | 34 | 71 | 151 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ChanceRetired | FaberRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Series titles | 2 | 1 |
| Pennants as manager | 4 | — |
| Career batting average | 0.296 | — |
| Career stolen bases | 401 | — |
| Wins as manager | 946 | — |
| Career wins | — | 254 |
| Career innings pitched | — | 4,086 |
| ERA titles | — | 2 |
| Career strikeouts | — | 1,471 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 92 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Faber86.6
Chance86.5
FAQ
Where does Chance beat Faber?
Chance scores higher on dominance, honours. Faber leads on statistics, longevity.
How is the Chance vs Faber score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Chance: 86.5, Faber: 86.6.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Chance vs Faber. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.