Who is better, Foyston or Lumley?
Frank Foyston leads with a GOAT score of 86.2 against 86.1 for Harry Lumley — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Foyston vs Lumley
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Frank Foyston above Harry Lumley: 86.2 vs 86.1. Frank Foyston leads on Honours. Harry Lumley leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
FoystonWinner
86.2Foyston wins: Honours
Lumley
86.1Lumley wins: Longevity, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to Ice HockeyShareable URL · /compare/frank-foyston-vs-harry-lumley-hockey
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇦 Frank Foyston
86.2
Foyston leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Frank Foyston
2. Harry Lumley
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇨🇦 Frank Foyston5 seasons played · career day 1,826341 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇦 Harry Lumley5 seasons played · career day 1,825318 points
-6.7% vs Foyston at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Foyston | 0 | 0 | 55 | 117 | 260 | 698 |
| 🇨🇦 Lumley | 0 | 0 | 55 | 114 | 318 | 651 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Foyston86.2
Lumley86.1
FAQ
Where does Lumley beat Foyston?
Lumley scores higher on statistics, longevity. Foyston leads on honours.
How is the Foyston vs Lumley score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Foyston: 86.2, Lumley: 86.1.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Foyston vs Lumley. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.