Who is better, Gatski or Otto?
Frank Gatski leads with a GOAT score of 88.4 against 88.3 for Jim Otto — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Gatski vs Otto
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Frank Gatski above Jim Otto: 88.4 vs 88.3. Frank Gatski leads on Honours. Jim Otto leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
GatskiWinner
88.4Gatski wins: Honours
Otto
88.3Otto wins: Longevity, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to American FootballShareable URL · /compare/frank-gatski-vs-jim-otto
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Frank Gatski
88.4
Gatski leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Frank Gatski
2. Jim Otto
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Jim Otto5 seasons played · career day 1,826341 touchdowns
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Frank Gatski5 seasons played · career day 1,825326 touchdowns
-4.4% vs Otto at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Gatski | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 326 | 669 |
| 🇺🇸 Otto | 0 | 0 | 55 | 117 | 260 | 696 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Gatski88.4
Otto88.3
FAQ
Where does Otto beat Gatski?
Otto scores higher on statistics, longevity. Gatski leads on honours.
How is the Gatski vs Otto score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Gatski: 88.4, Otto: 88.3.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Gatski vs Otto. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.