GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Hadow vs Navratilova

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
NavratilovaWinner
95.1

Navratilova wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics

Hadow
71.1

Hadow wins: no category outright

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/frank-hadow-vs-martina-navratilova

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Martina Navratilova
95.1

Navratilova leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories. 18 singles majors, 31 doubles majors and 167 career titles.

HadowInsufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.

1. Martina Navratilova
95.1
2. Frank Hadow
Pending verification

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Through age 22 · Titles per season
1. 🇺🇸 Martina Navratilova11 titles
1 season by age 22 · 11 per season

Setting the pace at age 22

No verified birth date for Hadow — shown in the pro-debut view instead.

Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 22, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.

MetricHadowRetiredNavratilovaRetired
Wimbledon titles19
Sets lost at Wimbledon0
Tournaments played1
Grand Slam titles1
Career span in years1
Grand Slam singles titles18
Grand Slam doubles titles31
Career singles titles167
Weeks at No. 1332
Match win %90.1%
Dominance w25%7495
Peak w20%9294
Longevity w20%4097
Honours w20%7496
Statistics w15%7693

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Navratilova95.1
Hadow71.1
The people
Hadow
Navratilova

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Hadow vs Navratilova. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →