Who is better, Hadow or Serena?
Serena Williams leads with a GOAT score of 94.6 against 71.1 for Frank Hadow — a gap of 23.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Serena Williams above Frank Hadow: 94.6 vs 71.1. Serena Williams leads on Longevity, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Serena wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Hadow wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/frank-hadow-vs-serena
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Serena leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Hadow — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Hadow — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | HadowRetired | SerenaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Wimbledon titles | 1 | — |
| Sets lost at Wimbledon | 0 | — |
| Tournaments played | 1 | — |
| Grand Slam titles | 1 | 23 |
| Career span in years | 1 | — |
| Weeks at No. 1 | — | 319 |
| Masters 1000 titles | — | 23 |
| Career titles | — | 73 |
| Match win % | — | 85.8% |
| Year-end No. 1 finishes | — | 5 |
| Olympic gold | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 96 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 40 | 93 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 95 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 92 |
Serena Williams leads with a GOAT score of 94.6 against 71.1 for Frank Hadow — a gap of 23.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hadow does not lead any of the five categories; Serena is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hadow: 71.1, Serena: 94.6.
Make your case for Hadow vs Serena. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.