Who is better, McGee or Dryden?
Frank McGee leads with a GOAT score of 86.4 against 86.4 for Ken Dryden — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
McGee vs Dryden
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Frank McGee and Ken Dryden level at 86.4. Frank McGee leads on Dominance, Statistics, Peak. Ken Dryden leads on Honours, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
McGeeWinner
86.4McGee wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Dryden
86.4Dryden wins: Longevity, Honours
Candidates
Locked to Ice HockeyShareable URL · /compare/frank-mcgee-vs-ken-dryden
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇦 Frank McGee
86.4
McGee leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Frank McGee
2. Ken Dryden
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇨🇦 Ken Dryden5 seasons played · career day 1,825428 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇦 Frank McGee4 seasons played · career day 1,460309 points
-27.8% vs Dryden at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 McGee | 0 | 0 | 70 | 169 | 309 | 309 |
| 🇨🇦 Dryden | 0 | 0 | 70 | 149 | 428 | 731 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
McGee86.4
Dryden86.4
FAQ
Where does Dryden beat McGee?
Dryden scores higher on honours, longevity. McGee leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
How is the McGee vs Dryden score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. McGee: 86.4, Dryden: 86.4.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for McGee vs Dryden. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.