GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Sedgman vs Järryd

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
SedgmanWinner
84.5

Sedgman wins: Dominance, Peak

Järryd
84.5

Järryd wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/frank-sedgman-vs-anders-jarryd

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Frank Sedgman
84.5

Sedgman leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Five-time major singles champion and a Davis Cup cornerstone for Australia.

1. Frank Sedgman
84.5
2. Anders Järryd
84.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇦🇺 Frank Sedgman5 seasons played · career day 1,825311 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 Anders Järryd5 seasons played · career day 2,55630 titles
-90.4% vs Sedgman at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇦🇺 Sedgman004599311670
🇸🇪 Järryd0000941

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricSedgmanRetiredJärrydRetired
Major singles titles5
Major doubles titles9
Wimbledon titles1
Davis Cup titles45
Major finals9
Grand Slam doubles titles8
ATP doubles titles59
Singles career-high ranking5
ATP singles titles8
Dominance w25%8478
Peak w20%9288
Longevity w20%7886
Honours w20%8688
Statistics w15%8284

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Sedgman84.5
Järryd84.5
The people
Sedgman
Järryd

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Sedgman vs Järryd. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →