Who is better, Van Almsick or Klochkova?
Franziska van Almsick leads with a GOAT score of 88.0 against 87.9 for Yana Klochkova — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Franziska van Almsick above Yana Klochkova: 88.0 vs 87.9. Franziska van Almsick leads on Longevity, Statistics. Yana Klochkova leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Van Almsick wins: Longevity, Statistics
Klochkova wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/franziska-van-almsick-vs-yana-klochkova
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Van Almsick leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Van Almsick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 119.9 | 478.7 | 960.1 |
| 🇺🇦 Klochkova | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.77 | 30.5 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Van AlmsickRetired | KlochkovaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 10 | — |
| World Championship golds | 3 | 5 |
| European titles | 18 | 12 |
| 200 m freestyle world records | 2 | — |
| 200 m freestyle best | 118 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 4 |
| World records | — | 1 |
| 400m medley best (min) | — | 4.33 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 90 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteFranziska van Almsick leads with a GOAT score of 88.0 against 87.9 for Yana Klochkova — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Klochkova scores higher on dominance, honours. Van Almsick leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Van Almsick: 88.0, Klochkova: 87.9.
Make your case for Van Almsick vs Klochkova. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.