Who is better, Apostoli or Dempsey?
Jack Dempsey leads with a GOAT score of 84.3 against 84.1 for Fred Apostoli — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Apostoli vs Dempsey
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jack Dempsey above Fred Apostoli: 84.3 vs 84.1. Jack Dempsey leads on Dominance. Fred Apostoli leads on Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
DempseyWinner
84.3Dempsey wins: Dominance
Apostoli
84.1Apostoli wins: Statistics
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/fred-apostoli-vs-jack-dempsey
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Jack Dempsey
84.3
Dempsey leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Jack Dempsey
2. Fred Apostoli
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Fred Apostoli5 years played · career day 1,825327 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Jack Dempsey5 years played · career day 3,28642 title wins
-87.2% vs Apostoli at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Apostoli | 0 | 0 | 45 | 100 | 327 | 667 |
| 🇺🇸 Dempsey | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 42 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Dempsey84.3
Apostoli84.1
FAQ
Where does Apostoli beat Dempsey?
Apostoli scores higher on statistics. Dempsey leads on dominance.
How is the Apostoli vs Dempsey score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Apostoli: 84.1, Dempsey: 84.3.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Apostoli vs Dempsey. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.