GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Trueman vs Richards

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
RichardsWinner
90.2

Richards wins: Dominance, Honours

Trueman
90.1

Trueman wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/fred-trueman-vs-viv-richards

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🏴 Viv Richards
90.2

Richards leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Never lost a Test series as captain and batted without a helmet.

1. Viv Richards
90.2
2. Fred Trueman
90.1

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🏴 Viv Richards5 years played · career day 3,286316 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Fred Trueman5 years played · career day 2,92185 runs
-73.1% vs Richards at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Trueman000038119
🏴 Richards000055316

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricTruemanRetiredRichardsRetired
Test wickets307
First-class wickets2,304
Test bowling average21.6
Five-wicket hauls17
Test matches67
Test runs8,540
Test centuries24
World Cups2
Test average50.23
ODI runs6,721
Wisden Cricketer of the Century1
Dominance w25%8890
Peak w20%9493
Longevity w20%9088
Honours w20%8690
Statistics w15%9490

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Richards90.2
Trueman90.1
The people
Trueman
Richards

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Trueman vs Richards. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →