Who is better, Freeman or Verlander?
Freddie Freeman leads with a GOAT score of 90.0 against 88.8 for Justin Verlander — a gap of 1.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Freddie Freeman above Justin Verlander: 90.0 vs 88.8. Freddie Freeman leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Justin Verlander leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Freeman wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Verlander wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/freddie-freeman-vs-justin-verlander
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Freeman leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Freeman | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 85 | 188 |
| 🇺🇸 Verlander | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.63 | 15.58 | 27.45 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FreemanActive · Los Angeles Dodgers | VerlanderActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Series titles | 2 | 2 |
| MVP awards | 1 | — |
| World Series MVP awards | 1 | — |
| All-Star selections | 8 | — |
| Career hits | 2,300 | — |
| Cy Young Awards | — | 3 |
| League MVP awards | — | 1 |
| Career strikeouts | — | 3,400 |
| No-hitters | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 92 |
Freddie Freeman leads with a GOAT score of 90.0 against 88.8 for Justin Verlander — a gap of 1.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Verlander scores higher on longevity. Freeman leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Freeman: 90.0, Verlander: 88.8.
Make your case for Freeman vs Verlander. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.