GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Bull vs Duleepsinhji

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BullWinner
79.3

Bull wins: Longevity

Duleepsinhji
79.1

Duleepsinhji wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/frederick-bull-vs-duleepsinhji

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Frederick Bull
79.3

Bull leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Essex spinner who took 121 wickets in the 1897 season.

1. Frederick Bull
79.3
2. Duleepsinhji
79.1

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇮🇳 Duleepsinhji5 years played · career day 1,8267,662 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Frederick Bull5 years played · career day 1,825305 runs
-96.0% vs Duleepsinhji at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Bull004598305630
🇮🇳 Duleepsinhji004201,4005,10014,407

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricBullRetiredDuleepsinhjiRetired
First-class wickets484
Wickets in 1897121
Seasons with 100 wickets1
Ten-wicket matches12
Seasons played11
Test batting average58.52
Test runs995
First-class runs15,485
First-class centuries50
Tests played12
Dominance w25%7680
Peak w20%8892
Longevity w20%7462
Honours w20%7274
Statistics w15%9090

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Bull79.3
Duleepsinhji79.1
The people
Bull
Duleepsinhji

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Bull vs Duleepsinhji. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →