Who is better, Bull or Ashton?
Hubert Ashton leads with a GOAT score of 79.4 against 79.3 for Frederick Bull — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Hubert Ashton above Frederick Bull: 79.4 vs 79.3. Hubert Ashton leads on Honours, Longevity. Frederick Bull leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ashton wins: Longevity, Honours
Bull wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/frederick-bull-vs-hubert-ashton
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ashton leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Bull | 0 | 0 | 45 | 98 | 305 | 630 |
| 🇬🇧 Ashton | 0 | 0 | 50 | 114 | 370 | 698 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BullRetired | AshtonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| First-class wickets | 484 | — |
| Wickets in 1897 | 121 | — |
| Seasons with 100 wickets | 1 | — |
| Ten-wicket matches | 12 | — |
| Seasons played | 11 | — |
| First-class runs | — | 4,147 |
| First-class centuries | — | 9 |
| Wisden Cricketer of the Year | — | 1 |
| First-class matches | — | 90 |
| Batting average | — | 38 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 86 |
Hubert Ashton leads with a GOAT score of 79.4 against 79.3 for Frederick Bull — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Bull scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Ashton leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bull: 79.3, Ashton: 79.4.
Make your case for Bull vs Ashton. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.