Who is better, Hovey or Cash?
Frederick Hovey leads with a GOAT score of 80.6 against 80.6 for Pat Cash — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Hovey vs Cash
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Frederick Hovey and Pat Cash level at 80.6. Frederick Hovey leads on Dominance, Statistics, Honours. Pat Cash leads on Longevity, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HoveyWinner
80.6Hovey wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Cash
80.6Cash wins: Peak, Longevity
Candidates
Locked to TennisShareable URL · /compare/frederick-hovey-vs-pat-cash
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Frederick Hovey
80.6
Hovey leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Frederick Hovey
2. Pat Cash
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Frederick Hovey5 seasons played · career day 1,825375 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇦🇺 Pat Cash5 seasons played · career day 1,825297 titles
-20.8% vs Hovey at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Hovey | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 375 | 490 |
| 🇦🇺 Cash | 0 | 0 | 35 | 82 | 297 | 635 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Hovey80.6
Cash80.6
FAQ
Where does Cash beat Hovey?
Cash scores higher on peak, longevity. Hovey leads on dominance, honours, statistics.
How is the Hovey vs Cash score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hovey: 80.6, Cash: 80.6.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Hovey vs Cash. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.