GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Ljungberg vs Chiesa

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
LjungbergWinner
82.1

Ljungberg wins: Longevity

Chiesa
82.1

Chiesa wins: Dominance, Peak

Candidates
Locked to Football

Shareable URL · /compare/fredrik-ljungberg-vs-federico-chiesa-v

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇸🇪 Fredrik Ljungberg
82.1

Ljungberg leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Invincible with Arsenal, winning two Premier League titles and three FA Cups.

1. Fredrik Ljungberg
82.1
2. Federico Chiesa
82.1

Category breakdown

Season form · Goals per season

Career timeline · Goals per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Goals per season
1. 🇮🇹 Federico Chiesa5 seasons played · career day 1,826349 goals
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 Fredrik Ljungberg5 seasons played · career day 1,825314 goals
-10.0% vs Chiesa at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇸🇪 Ljungberg0050106314669
🇮🇹 Chiesa0055117264703

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricLjungbergRetiredChiesaActive
Premier League titles2
FA Cup titles3
Sweden caps75
Arsenal appearances328
Career goals10590
European Championship titles1
Euro 2020 goals2
Coppa Italia titles1
Italy caps55
Dominance w25%7680
Peak w20%8889
Longevity w20%8276
Honours w20%8484
Statistics w15%8282

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Ljungberg82.1
Chiesa82.1
The people
Ljungberg
Chiesa

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Ljungberg vs Chiesa. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →