Who is better, Anderson or Amundrud?
Gail Amundrud leads with a GOAT score of 77.5 against 77.0 for Freya Anderson — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Gail Amundrud above Freya Anderson: 77.5 vs 77.0. Gail Amundrud leads on Longevity, Honours. Freya Anderson leads on Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Amundrud wins: Longevity, Honours
Anderson wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/freya-anderson-vs-gail-amundrud
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Amundrud leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Anderson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 44 |
| 🇨🇦 Amundrud | 0 | 0 | 55 | 128 | 368 | 478 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AndersonActive | AmundrudRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| World Championship medals | 4 | — |
| European titles | 5 | — |
| Commonwealth medals | 2 | — |
| Olympic Games appearances | 2 | — |
| Olympic medals | — | 1 |
| Commonwealth Games gold medals | — | 1 |
| Commonwealth Games medals | — | 4 |
| Canadian titles | — | 5 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 68 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 82 |
Gail Amundrud leads with a GOAT score of 77.5 against 77.0 for Freya Anderson — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Anderson scores higher on peak, statistics. Amundrud leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Anderson: 77.0, Amundrud: 77.5.
Make your case for Anderson vs Amundrud. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.