Who is better, Anderson or Buddemeyer?
Melanie Buddemeyer leads with a GOAT score of 77.2 against 77.0 for Freya Anderson — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Melanie Buddemeyer above Freya Anderson: 77.2 vs 77.0. Melanie Buddemeyer leads on Honours, Dominance. Freya Anderson leads on Peak, Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Buddemeyer wins: Dominance, Honours
Anderson wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/freya-anderson-vs-melanie-buddemeyer
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Buddemeyer leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Anderson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 44 |
| 🇺🇸 Buddemeyer | 0 | 0 | 58 | 133 | 295 | 345 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AndersonActive | BuddemeyerRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| World Championship medals | 4 | 1 |
| European titles | 5 | — |
| Commonwealth medals | 2 | — |
| Olympic Games appearances | 2 | — |
| United States titles | — | 2 |
| Pan American medals | — | 1 |
| NCAA titles | — | 2 |
| National records | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 68 | 66 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 82 |
Melanie Buddemeyer leads with a GOAT score of 77.2 against 77.0 for Freya Anderson — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Anderson scores higher on peak, statistics, longevity. Buddemeyer leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Anderson: 77.0, Buddemeyer: 77.2.
Make your case for Anderson vs Buddemeyer. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.