Who is better, Walter or van Basten?
Fritz Walter leads with a GOAT score of 86.7 against 86.7 for Marco van Basten — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Fritz Walter and Marco van Basten level at 86.7. Fritz Walter leads on Longevity. Marco van Basten leads on Dominance, Statistics, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Walter wins: Longevity
van Basten wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/fritz-walter-vs-van-basten
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Walter leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Walter | 0 | 0 | 45 | 93 | 258 | 525 |
| 🇳🇱 van Basten | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 96 | 168 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | WalterRetired | van BastenRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| German championships | 1 | — |
| Germany caps | 61 | — |
| Germany goals | 33 | — |
| Seasons played | 23 | — |
| Ballon d'Or | — | 3 |
| European Cups | — | 2 |
| European Championships | — | 1 |
| Career goals | — | 300 |
| Serie A titles | — | 4 |
| Eredivisie top scorer | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 90 |
Fritz Walter leads with a GOAT score of 86.7 against 86.7 for Marco van Basten — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
van Basten scores higher on dominance, honours, statistics. Walter leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Walter: 86.7, van Basten: 86.7.
Make your case for Walter vs van Basten. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.