Who is better, Hartnett or Darvish?
Gabby Hartnett leads with a GOAT score of 87.6 against 87.6 for Yu Darvish — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Gabby Hartnett and Yu Darvish level at 87.6.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Hartnett wins: no category outright
Darvish wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/gabby-hartnett-vs-yu-darvish
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hartnett leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Hartnett | 0 | 0 | 0.194 | 0.462 | 1.325 | 2.533 |
| 🇯🇵 Darvish | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 498 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HartnettRetired | DarvishActive |
|---|---|---|
| MVP awards | 1 | — |
| All-Star selections | 6 | — |
| Career home runs | 236 | — |
| Career batting average | 0.297 | — |
| Pennants won | 4 | — |
| MLB All-Star selections | — | 5 |
| MLB strikeouts | — | 1,929 |
| NPB ERA | — | 1.99 |
| World Baseball Classic titles | — | 1 |
| Strikeout titles | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 92 |
Gabby Hartnett leads with a GOAT score of 87.6 against 87.6 for Yu Darvish — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Darvish does not lead any of the five categories; Hartnett is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hartnett: 87.6, Darvish: 87.6.
Make your case for Hartnett vs Darvish. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.