Who is better, Gabi or Van de Velde?
Gabriela Guimarães leads with a GOAT score of 73.8 against 73.1 for Steven van de Velde — a gap of 0.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Gabriela Guimarães above Steven van de Velde: 73.8 vs 73.1. Gabriela Guimarães leads on Dominance, Peak. Steven van de Velde leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Gabi wins: Dominance, Peak
Van de Velde wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/gabriela-guimaraes-vs-steven-van-de-velde-vb
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Gabi leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇷 Gabi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 17 | 61 |
| 🇳🇱 Van de Velde | 0 | 0 | 44 | 92 | 258 | 533 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GabiActive | Van de VeldeActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 2 | — |
| Nations League medals | 4 | — |
| Club World Championship titles | 2 | — |
| Brazilian league titles | 6 | — |
| MVP awards | 3 | — |
| World Tour titles | — | 2 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 1 |
| European Championship appearances | — | 6 |
| National titles | — | 2 |
| World Tour podiums | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 66 |
| Peak w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 70 | 70 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 76 |
Gabriela Guimarães leads with a GOAT score of 73.8 against 73.1 for Steven van de Velde — a gap of 0.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Van de Velde scores higher on longevity. Gabi leads on peak, dominance.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Gabi: 73.8, Van de Velde: 73.1.
Make your case for Gabi vs Van de Velde. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.