Who is better, Sabatini or Sears?
Gabriela Sabatini leads with a GOAT score of 80.5 against 80.4 for Richard Sears — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Gabriela Sabatini above Richard Sears: 80.5 vs 80.4. Gabriela Sabatini leads on Longevity, Statistics. Richard Sears leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Sabatini wins: Longevity, Statistics
Sears wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/gabriela-sabatini-vs-richard-sears
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Sabatini leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇷 Sabatini | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 18 | 35 |
| 🇺🇸 Sears | 0 | 0 | 70 | 149 | 419 | 568 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SabatiniRetired | SearsRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam singles titles | 1 | — |
| WTA titles | 27 | — |
| WTA Finals titles | 2 | — |
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| Career-high ranking | 3 | — |
| US Championships titles | — | 7 |
| US doubles titles | — | 6 |
| Consecutive national titles | — | 7 |
| Singles finals lost | — | 0 |
| Seasons on tour | — | 7 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 55 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 78 |
Gabriela Sabatini leads with a GOAT score of 80.5 against 80.4 for Richard Sears — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Sears scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Sabatini leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Sabatini: 80.5, Sears: 80.4.
Make your case for Sabatini vs Sears. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.