Who is better, Monfils or Orantes?
Gaël Monfils leads with a GOAT score of 78.6 against 78.6 for Manuel Orantes — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Gaël Monfils and Manuel Orantes level at 78.6. Gaël Monfils leads on Longevity, Statistics. Manuel Orantes leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Monfils wins: Longevity, Statistics
Orantes wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/gael-monfils-vs-manuel-orantes
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Monfils leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇷 Monfils | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 8 |
| 🇪🇸 Orantes | 0 | 0 | 50 | 107 | 323 | 671 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MonfilsActive | OrantesRetired |
|---|---|---|
| ATP titles | 13 | — |
| Career-high ranking | 6 | — |
| Career match wins | 600 | — |
| Grand Slam semi-finals | 2 | — |
| Davis Cup finals | 2 | — |
| Major singles titles | — | 1 |
| Career singles titles | — | 33 |
| Major finals | — | 2 |
| Career-high world ranking | — | 2 |
| Seasons on tour | — | 16 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 68 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 78 |
Gaël Monfils leads with a GOAT score of 78.6 against 78.6 for Manuel Orantes — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Orantes scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Monfils leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Monfils: 78.6, Orantes: 78.6.
Make your case for Monfils vs Orantes. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.