Who is better, Amundrud or Buddemeyer?
Gail Amundrud leads with a GOAT score of 77.5 against 77.2 for Melanie Buddemeyer — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Gail Amundrud above Melanie Buddemeyer: 77.5 vs 77.2. Gail Amundrud leads on Longevity. Melanie Buddemeyer leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Amundrud wins: Longevity
Buddemeyer wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/gail-amundrud-vs-melanie-buddemeyer
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Amundrud leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Amundrud | 0 | 0 | 55 | 128 | 368 | 478 |
| 🇺🇸 Buddemeyer | 0 | 0 | 58 | 133 | 295 | 345 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AmundrudRetired | BuddemeyerRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| Commonwealth Games gold medals | 1 | — |
| Commonwealth Games medals | 4 | — |
| Canadian titles | 5 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 1 | — |
| World Championship medals | — | 1 |
| United States titles | — | 2 |
| Pan American medals | — | 1 |
| NCAA titles | — | 2 |
| National records | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 66 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 82 |
Gail Amundrud leads with a GOAT score of 77.5 against 77.2 for Melanie Buddemeyer — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Buddemeyer scores higher on peak, dominance. Amundrud leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Amundrud: 77.5, Buddemeyer: 77.2.
Make your case for Amundrud vs Buddemeyer. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.